=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220
=> Bootstrap dependency fetch-[0-9]*: found fetch-1.8nb1
WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE.
=> Checksum SHA1 OK for spamass-milter-0.3.1.tar.gz
=> Checksum RMD160 OK for spamass-milter-0.3.1.tar.gz
=> Checksum SHA1 OK for spamass-milter-001.patch
=> Checksum RMD160 OK for spamass-milter-001.patch
===> Installing dependencies for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
=> Tool dependency nbpatch-[0-9]*: found nbpatch-20100124
=> Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11
=> Build dependency libmilter>=8.14: found libmilter-8.14.7
=> Full dependency spamassassin>=2.44: found spamassassin-3.3.2nb3
===> Overriding tools for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
===> Extracting for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
===> Patching for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
=> Applying distribution patches for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
=> Applying distribution patch spamass-milter-001.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: README
|===================================================================
|RCS file: /sources/spamass-milt/spamass-milt/README,v
|retrieving revision 1.6
|retrieving revision 1.7
|diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
|--- README	15 Aug 2005 15:10:47 -0000	1.6
|+++ README	19 Apr 2006 15:40:36 -0000	1.7
--------------------------
Patching file README using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 57.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: spamass-milter.cpp
|===================================================================
|RCS file: /sources/spamass-milt/spamass-milt/spamass-milter.cpp,v
|retrieving revision 1.90
|retrieving revision 1.91
|diff -u -p -r1.90 -r1.91
|--- spamass-milter.cpp	23 Mar 2006 21:41:36 -0000	1.90
|+++ spamass-milter.cpp	24 Jul 2006 19:59:17 -0000	1.91
--------------------------
Patching file spamass-milter.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 127.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1002.
done
=> Applying pkgsrc patches for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/mail/spamass-milter/patches/patch-aa
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/mail/spamass-milter/patches/patch-aa
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.5 2011/03/18 15:26:30 gdt Exp $
|
|This patch has hunks for multiple reasons:
|
|1) Ancient fix to avoid going beyond s2.
|
|2) Added CVE-2010-1132 patch from:
|
|  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=401011
|
|3) (Most of, some in .h) patch to add option to not scan mail from
|authenticated users, from:
|
|  http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2006-November/106024.html
|
|4) Avoid memory allocation in after fork and before exec.  From PR pkg/44704.
|
|--- spamass-milter.cpp.orig	2011-03-18 15:15:56.000000000 +0000
|+++ spamass-milter.cpp
--------------------------
Patching file spamass-milter.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 170.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 178.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 193.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 281.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 302.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 462.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 749.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 817.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 854.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 1299.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 1348.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 1984.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 2108.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/mail/spamass-milter/patches/patch-ab
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/mail/spamass-milter/patches/patch-ab
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.2 2010/09/10 23:33:42 gdt Exp $
|CVE-2010-1132 patch from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=401011
|
|--- spamass-milter.h.orig	2006-03-23 22:07:55.000000000 +0000
|+++ spamass-milter.h
--------------------------
Patching file spamass-milter.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 186.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/mail/spamass-milter/patches/patch-ac
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/mail/spamass-milter/patches/patch-ac
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ac,v 1.1 2010/09/10 23:33:42 gdt Exp $
|
|(Part of) patch to add option to not scan mail from authenticated
|users, from:
|
|  http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2006-November/106024.html
|
|--- spamass-milter.1.in.orig	2004-03-18 18:37:08.000000000 +0000
|+++ spamass-milter.1.in
--------------------------
Patching file spamass-milter.1.in using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 199.
done
===> Creating toolchain wrappers for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
===> Configuring for spamass-milter-0.3.1nb4
=> Modifying GNU configure scripts to avoid --recheck
=> Replacing config-guess with pkgsrc versions
=> Replacing config-sub with pkgsrc versions
=> Replacing install-sh with pkgsrc version
=> Checking for portability problems in extracted files
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o pbulk -g pbulk
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... /usr/bin/awk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-g++... g++
checking for C++ compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-gcc... gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... none
checking for C compiler warning flags... -Wall
checking whether the compiler supports exceptions... yes
checking whether the compiler implements namespaces... yes
checking whether the compiler has __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler... yes
checking for -fno-default-inline... yes
checking for -fno-inline... yes
checking for spamc... /usr/pkg/bin/spamc
checking for sendmail... /usr/sbin/sendmail
checking for nroff... nroff
checking for mdoc nroff macros... yes
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for pthread_join in LIBS=-lpthread -lrt with CFLAGS= -pthread ... yes
checking for joinable pthread attribute... PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE
checking if more special flags are required for pthreads... no
checking for cc_r... gcc
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking for egrep... grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking fcntl.h usability... yes
checking fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking sys/cdefs.h usability... yes
checking sys/cdefs.h presence... yes
checking for sys/cdefs.h... yes
checking sys/select.h usability... yes
checking sys/select.h presence... yes
checking for sys/select.h... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for pid_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking if we must define _GNU_SOURCE... no
checking poll.h usability... yes
checking poll.h presence... yes
checking for poll.h... yes
checking if malloc debugging is wanted... no
checking for vsyslog... yes
checking for vasprintf... yes
checking for vsnprintf... yes
checking for asprintf... yes
checking for snprintf... yes
checking for library containing gethostbyname... none required
checking for library containing connect... none required
checking for library containing inet_aton... none required
checking for strsep... yes
checking for daemon... yes
checking whether strsep is declared... yes
checking whether daemon is declared... yes
checking for mi_stop in -lmilter... yes
checking libmilter/mfapi.h usability... yes
checking libmilter/mfapi.h presence... yes
checking for libmilter/mfapi.h... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating contrib/spamass-milter.spec
config.status: creating spamass-milter.1
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands