=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220
=> Bootstrap dependency fetch-[0-9]*: found fetch-1.8nb1
=> Checksum SHA1 OK for ex-040103.tar.gz
=> Checksum RMD160 OK for ex-040103.tar.gz
===> Installing dependencies for ex-20040103nb3
==========================================================================
The following variables will affect the build process of this package,
ex-20040103nb3.  Their current value is shown below:

        * CURSES_DEFAULT = ncurses

Based on these variables, the following variables have been set:

        * CURSES_TYPE = ncurses

You may want to abort the process now with CTRL-C and change their value
before continuing.  Be sure to run `/usr/pkg/bin/bmake clean' after
the changes.
==========================================================================
=> Tool dependency nbpatch-[0-9]*: found nbpatch-20100124
=> Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11
=> Full dependency ncurses>=5.4nb1: found ncurses-5.9
===> Overriding tools for ex-20040103nb3
===> Extracting for ex-20040103nb3
=> Changing 'getline' to 'get_line'
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_addr.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_cmds2.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_data.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_extern.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_put.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_set.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_tagio.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_tty.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_unix.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_v.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_version.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_vmain.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./ex_vput.c.
INFO: [subst.mk:getline] Nothing changed in ./expreserve.c.
===> Patching for ex-20040103nb3
=> Applying pkgsrc patches for ex-20040103nb3
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-aa
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-aa
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.8 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- configure paths and programs for pkgsrc
|- don't install the executable sticky as that's often no longer allowed
|- don't create the PRESERVEDIR at install time
|  (the pkgsrc makefile takes care of it)
|
|--- Makefile.orig	2004-01-03 14:22:47.000000000 +0000
|+++ Makefile
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 80.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 140.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 182.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 191.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 297.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 305.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ab
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ab
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.2 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- use standard headers
|  (these functions are supposed to substitute for the libc ones, so they
|  need to match stdlib.h exactly)
|- declare void functions void
|
|--- malloc.c.orig	2002-03-02 12:15:03.000000000 +0000
|+++ malloc.c
--------------------------
Patching file malloc.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 45.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 236.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 333.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ac
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ac
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ac,v 1.5 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- use standard headers
|  (these functions are supposed to substitute for the libc ones, so they
|  need to match stdlib.h exactly)
|- use own headers
|- declare void functions void
|- fix return and argument types
|
|--- mapmalloc.c.orig	2003-01-28 20:04:25.000000000 +0000
|+++ mapmalloc.c
--------------------------
Patching file mapmalloc.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 54.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 170.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 300.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 421.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 461.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 488.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 518.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 529.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 586.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ad
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ad
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ad,v 1.2 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- teach it about dead functions
|- use const for string constants
|- use speed_t for tty speed
|- don't declare versionstring, which is static in ex_version.c
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|
|--- ex.h.orig	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex.h
--------------------------
Patching file ex.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 238.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 410.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 492.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 513.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 539.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 562.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 651.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 675.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__addr_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__addr_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__addr_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|
|--- ex_addr.c~	2002-02-02 02:08:35.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_addr.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_addr.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 102.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 115.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 134.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 158.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 172.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 193.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 383.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 391.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__argv_h
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__argv_h
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__argv_h,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|
|--- ex_argv.h~	2002-02-02 00:05:46.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_argv.h
--------------------------
Patching file ex_argv.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 102.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__cmds2_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__cmds2_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__cmds2_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- avoid implicit int
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|
|--- ex_cmds2.c~	2002-02-02 02:08:35.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_cmds2.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_cmds2.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 95.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 109.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 131.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 147.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 195.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 234.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 270.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 286.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 305.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 319.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 333.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 353.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 410.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 425.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 445.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 462.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 478.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 497.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 511.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 522.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 536.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 554.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 595.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 665.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__cmds_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__cmds_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__cmds_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- silence warnings about braces
|
|--- ex_cmds.c~	2012-12-27 20:24:51.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_cmds.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_cmds.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 96.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 128.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 166.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 174.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__cmdsub_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__cmdsub_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__cmdsub_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- avoid implicit int
|- declare void functions void
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- use const for string constants
|
|--- ex_cmdsub.c.orig	2012-12-27 21:58:41.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_cmdsub.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_cmdsub.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 93.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 147.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 160.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 187.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 248.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 263.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 284.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 309.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 325.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 336.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 391.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 414.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 427.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 438.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 463.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 501.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 559.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 648.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 791.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 816.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 878.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 888.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 973.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 999.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 1013.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 1065.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 1212.
Hunk #28 succeeded at 1309.
Hunk #29 succeeded at 1338.
Hunk #30 succeeded at 1409.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__get_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__get_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__get_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- silence warnings about braces
|- don't put external declarations inside functions
|
|--- ex_get.c.orig	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_get.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_get.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 90.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 116.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 158.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 169.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 179.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 193.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 213.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 228.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 260.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 362.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__io_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__io_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__io_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence miscellaneous gcc45 warning
|- silence warnings about braces
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|- use const for string constants
|
|--- ex_io.c~	2012-12-27 20:24:51.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_io.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_io.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 109.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 169.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 197.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 273.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 288.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 376.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 399.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 415.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 611.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 647.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 693.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 743.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 757.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 846.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 868.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 887.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 942.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 951.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 998.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1016.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1077.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1110.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__proto_h
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__proto_h
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__proto_h,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- don't declare static functions in header files
|- avoid sloppy code that subtracts 1 from the base address of a char[]
|  (which isn't valid)
|
|--- ex_proto.h.orig	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_proto.h
--------------------------
Patching file ex_proto.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 81.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__put_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__put_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__put_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- use const for string constants
|- return values from non-void functions
|- silence warnings about braces
|- declare void functions void
|- remove unused function
|
|--- ex_put.c.orig	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_put.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_put.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 99.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 113.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 127.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 164.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 194.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 229.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 242.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 256.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 288.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 296.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 322.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 343.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 357.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 373.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 385.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 398.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 481.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 597.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 776.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 791.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 848.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 865.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 880.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 899.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 923.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 940.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 958.
Hunk #28 succeeded at 977.
Hunk #29 succeeded at 987.
Hunk #30 succeeded at 999.
Hunk #31 succeeded at 1010.
Hunk #32 succeeded at 1045.
Hunk #33 succeeded at 1057.
Hunk #34 succeeded at 1097.
Hunk #35 succeeded at 1132.
Hunk #36 succeeded at 1153.
Hunk #37 succeeded at 1171.
Hunk #38 succeeded at 1273.
Hunk #39 succeeded at 1310.
Hunk #40 succeeded at 1326.
Hunk #41 succeeded at 1339.
Hunk #42 succeeded at 1350.
Hunk #43 succeeded at 1362.
Hunk #44 succeeded at 1405.
Hunk #45 succeeded at 1432.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__re_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__re_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__re_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|- wrap unused function in the proper matching ifdef
|- avoid implicit int
|- fix signed/unsigned mismatch
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|
|--- ex_re.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_re.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_re.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 82.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 223.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 232.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 255.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 275.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 308.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 378.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 480.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 492.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 507.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 553.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 568.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 583.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 602.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 678.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 701.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 714.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 728.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1006.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1060.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1143.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 1369.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 1390.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 1412.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 1459.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 1468.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 1651.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__set_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__set_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__set_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- use const for string constants
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|
|--- ex_set.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_set.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_set.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 88.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 110.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 147.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 194.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 238.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 264.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 296.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__subr_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__subr_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__subr_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- use standard headers
|- avoid sloppy code that subtracts 1 from the base address of a char[]
|  (which isn't valid) (although this could be tidied further)
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|- use <ctype.h> functions properly
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|- teach it about dead functions
|
|--- ex_subr.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_subr.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_subr.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 79.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 120.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 135.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 149.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 161.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 173.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 185.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 195.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 203.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 213.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 230.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 254.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 274.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 287.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 298.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 306.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 336.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 366.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 374.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 407.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 426.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 452.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 475.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 514.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 527.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 551.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 562.
Hunk #28 succeeded at 570.
Hunk #29 succeeded at 578.
Hunk #30 succeeded at 586.
Hunk #31 succeeded at 612.
Hunk #32 succeeded at 635.
Hunk #33 succeeded at 643.
Hunk #34 succeeded at 660.
Hunk #35 succeeded at 669.
Hunk #36 succeeded at 694.
Hunk #37 succeeded at 735.
Hunk #38 succeeded at 771.
Hunk #39 succeeded at 801.
Hunk #40 succeeded at 815.
Hunk #41 succeeded at 848.
Hunk #42 succeeded at 871.
Hunk #43 succeeded at 903.
Hunk #44 succeeded at 923.
Hunk #45 succeeded at 956.
Hunk #46 succeeded at 988.
Hunk #47 succeeded at 1015.
Hunk #48 succeeded at 1043.
Hunk #49 succeeded at 1074.
Hunk #50 succeeded at 1105.
Hunk #51 succeeded at 1124.
Hunk #52 succeeded at 1148.
Hunk #53 succeeded at 1168.
Hunk #54 succeeded at 1179.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__tagio_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__tagio_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__tagio_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- avoid implicit int
|- don't misuse NULL
|- declare void functions void
|
|--- ex_tagio.c~	2003-09-03 19:53:02.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_tagio.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_tagio.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 96.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 117.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 136.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 148.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 173.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__temp_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__temp_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__temp_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:08 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- silence signed/unsigned compiler warning
|- return values from non-void functions
|
|--- ex_temp.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:41.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_temp.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_temp.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 106.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 199.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 217.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 228.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 249.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 270.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 327.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 359.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 367.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 383.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 447.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 503.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 553.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 574.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 588.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 610.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 620.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 662.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 678.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 705.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 744.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 754.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 781.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 796.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__tty_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__tty_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__tty_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use standard headers
|- declare local functions (and data) static
|- declare void functions void
|- don't put function declarations inside other functions
|- return values from non-void functions
|
|--- ex_tty.c~	2003-03-18 20:29:07.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_tty.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_tty.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 79.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 97.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 174.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 192.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 228.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 320.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 377.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 406.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 447.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 460.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__tty_h
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__tty_h
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__tty_h,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use const for string constants
|- declare void functions void
|- don't declare local functions in header files
|
|--- ex_tty.h.orig	2002-02-06 00:43:55.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_tty.h
--------------------------
Patching file ex_tty.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 259.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 275.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__unix_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__unix_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__unix_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|
|--- ex_unix.c~	2003-09-03 19:53:02.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_unix.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_unix.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 95.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 218.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 301.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 331.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 395.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 425.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 455.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__v_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__v_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__v_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- don't declare local functions in headers
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|
|--- ex_v.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_v.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_v.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 127.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 138.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 148.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 219.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 236.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 258.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 296.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 337.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 366.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 382.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 403.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 444.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 487.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 510.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 529.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vadj_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vadj_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vadj_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about braces
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|
|--- ex_vadj.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vadj.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vadj.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 90.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 106.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 119.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 171.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 259.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 301.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 383.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 430.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 459.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 478.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 490.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 524.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 553.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 604.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 619.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 697.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 819.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 866.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 896.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 918.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 954.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 993.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 1018.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 1077.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 1158.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 1179.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__version_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__version_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__version_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|
|--- ex_version.c~	2004-01-03 14:11:39.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_version.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_version.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 74.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vget_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vget_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vget_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- use const for string constants
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|
|--- ex_vget.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vget.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vget.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 89.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 107.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 123.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 142.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 252.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 296.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 325.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 337.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 390.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 408.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 424.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 434.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 448.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 479.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 496.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 515.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 531.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 574.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 648.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 687.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 704.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 733.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 751.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 767.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vis_h
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vis_h
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vis_h,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use const for string constants
|- declare void functions void
|- remove stray extra copies of function declarations from elsewhere
|
|--- ex_vis.h~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vis.h
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vis.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 300.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 333.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vmain_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vmain_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vmain_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- use volatile for compiler warnings about setjmp/vfork clobbering
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- use <ctype.h> functions correctly
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|
|--- ex_vmain.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vmain.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vmain.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 83.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 96.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 169.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 214.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 644.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 874.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 907.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1168.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1255.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 1280.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 1294.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 1311.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 1339.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1363.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1453.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1464.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1475.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__voper_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__voper_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__voper_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- use <ctype.h> functions correctly
|- avoid implicit int
|
|--- ex_voper.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:41.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_voper.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_voper.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 89.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 129.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 151.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 164.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 179.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 198.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 217.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 341.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 385.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 447.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 476.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 512.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 552.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 577.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 610.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 621.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 688.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 710.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 797.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 836.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 853.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 866.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 882.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 905.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 933.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 946.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 971.
Hunk #28 succeeded at 986.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vops2_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vops2_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vops2_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- use const for string constants
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- avoid sloppy code that subtracts 1 from the base address of a char[]
|  (which isn't valid)
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- silence warnings about braces
|
|
|--- ex_vops2.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vops2.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vops2.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 91.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 119.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 139.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 169.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 190.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 253.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 281.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 345.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 551.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 576.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 609.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 636.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 788.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 853.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1008.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1032.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 1075.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 1096.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1112.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vops3_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vops3_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vops3_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions (and data) static
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|- use const for string constants
|- declare void functions void
|
|
|--- ex_vops3.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:41.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vops3.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vops3.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 99.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 127.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 147.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 216.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 252.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 262.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 278.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 291.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 311.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 339.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 351.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 361.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 393.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 419.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 450.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 489.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 516.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 537.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 567.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 577.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 590.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 604.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 621.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 644.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vops_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vops_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vops_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- silence warnings about braces
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- use const for string constants
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|- silence signed/unsigned compiler warning
|
|--- ex_vops.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vops.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vops.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 89.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 112.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 139.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 176.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 254.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 264.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 342.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 362.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 429.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 447.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 507.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 724.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 739.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 814.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 838.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 907.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 979.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 990.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 1025.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 1046.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 1069.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vput_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vput_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vput_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- return values from non-void functions
|- silence warnings about && and || precedence
|- silence warnings about braces
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|
|--- ex_vput.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:42.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vput.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vput.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 88.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 103.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 123.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 137.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 158.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 173.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 204.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 257.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 272.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 286.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 300.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 312.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 323.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 339.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 352.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 362.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 376.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 389.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 538.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 571.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 583.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 612.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 628.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 646.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 712.
Hunk #26 succeeded at 806.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 848.
Hunk #28 succeeded at 888.
Hunk #29 succeeded at 923.
Hunk #30 succeeded at 1028.
Hunk #31 succeeded at 1039.
Hunk #32 succeeded at 1078.
Hunk #33 succeeded at 1201.
Hunk #34 succeeded at 1221.
Hunk #35 succeeded at 1239.
Hunk #36 succeeded at 1248.
Hunk #37 succeeded at 1268.
Hunk #38 succeeded at 1323.
Hunk #39 succeeded at 1334.
Hunk #40 succeeded at 1359.
Hunk #41 succeeded at 1380.
Hunk #42 succeeded at 1405.
Hunk #43 succeeded at 1444.
Hunk #44 succeeded at 1509.
Hunk #45 succeeded at 1611.
Hunk #46 succeeded at 1635.
Hunk #47 succeeded at 1644.
Hunk #48 succeeded at 1665.
Hunk #49 succeeded at 1688.
Hunk #50 succeeded at 1697.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vwind_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex__vwind_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex__vwind_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- hide unused function in the proper matching ifdef
|
|--- ex_vwind.c~	2012-12-27 21:58:41.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex_vwind.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex_vwind.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 89.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 104.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 120.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 139.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 161.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 211.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 261.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 306.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 324.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 378.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 394.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 415.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 436.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 478.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 523.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 552.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-ex_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ex_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- use volatile for compiler warnings about setjmp/vfork clobbering
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|
|--- ex.c~	2003-03-18 20:47:50.000000000 +0000
|+++ ex.c
--------------------------
Patching file ex.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 144.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 162.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 171.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 182.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 197.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 217.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 246.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 271.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 284.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 570.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-expreserve_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-expreserve_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-expreserve_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- use static for local functions
|- use a bit of const
|- silence gcc warnings about unused arguments
|- avoid implicit int
|- don't pass a string constant to putenv()
|
|--- expreserve.c.orig	2002-08-27 04:14:56.000000000 +0000
|+++ expreserve.c
--------------------------
Patching file expreserve.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 203.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 275.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 329.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 348.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 361.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 417.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 553.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 574.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-exrecover_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-exrecover_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-exrecover_c,v 1.2 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use standard headers
|- don't declare own perror
|- declare void functions void
|- avoid implicit int
|- silence signed/unsigned compiler warning
|- use const for string constants
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|- return values from non-void functions
|- silence warnings about unused arguments
|
|--- exrecover.c.orig	2012-12-27 21:58:41.000000000 +0000
|+++ exrecover.c
--------------------------
Patching file exrecover.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 98.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 195.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 297.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 352.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 387.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 490.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 527.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 537.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 562.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 616.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 671.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 698.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 718.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 803.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 811.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 819.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 840.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 880.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 901.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 912.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 956.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 972.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 987.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 1005.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_libterm_h
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_libterm_h
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-libterm_libterm_h,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use const for string constants
|- declare type of function pointer properly
|
|--- libterm/libterm.h.orig	2002-02-04 01:30:04.000000000 +0000
|+++ libterm/libterm.h
--------------------------
Patching file libterm/libterm.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 56.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_termcap_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_termcap_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-libterm_termcap_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare local functions static
|- avoid implicit int
|- use const for string constants
|
|--- libterm/termcap.c.orig	2004-01-03 14:17:30.000000000 +0000
|+++ libterm/termcap.c
--------------------------
Patching file libterm/termcap.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 93.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 122.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 181.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 285.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 319.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 348.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 379.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_tgoto_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_tgoto_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-libterm_tgoto_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use const for string constants
|- silence warnings about assignments in conditionals
|
|--- libterm/tgoto.c~	2002-02-04 01:30:04.000000000 +0000
|+++ libterm/tgoto.c
--------------------------
Patching file libterm/tgoto.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 83.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 104.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_tputs_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-libterm_tputs_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-libterm_tputs_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- declare void functions void
|- use const for string constants
|- fix up function pointer casting mess
|- silence signed/unsigned compiler warning
|
|--- libterm/tputs.c.orig	2002-02-04 03:15:46.000000000 +0000
|+++ libterm/tputs.c
--------------------------
Patching file libterm/tputs.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 71.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 122.
done
=> Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-printf_c
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/ex/patches/patch-printf_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-printf_c,v 1.1 2012/12/28 03:03:09 dholland Exp $
|
|- use standard headers
|  (this is supposed to substitute for libc's printf, so it *must*
|  match stdio.h)
|- use own headers
|- declare local functions static
|- avoid implicit int
|- return values from non-void functions
|- use const for string constants
|- remove/replace code that intentionally uses signed overflow
|
|--- printf.c.orig	2012-12-27 21:57:52.000000000 +0000
|+++ printf.c
--------------------------
Patching file printf.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 82.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 97.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 119.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 157.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 176.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 293.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 313.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 337.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 381.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 400.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 414.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 433.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 457.
done
===> Creating toolchain wrappers for ex-20040103nb3
===> Configuring for ex-20040103nb3
=> Checking for portability problems in extracted files