=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220 => Bootstrap dependency fetch-[0-9]*: found fetch-1.8nb1 WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE. => Checksum SHA1 OK for emacs-20.7-mule-4.1b-elc.tar.gz => Checksum RMD160 OK for emacs-20.7-mule-4.1b-elc.tar.gz => Checksum SHA1 OK for emacs-20.7-mule-4.1b.patch => Checksum RMD160 OK for emacs-20.7-mule-4.1b.patch => Checksum SHA1 OK for emacs-20.7.tar.gz => Checksum RMD160 OK for emacs-20.7.tar.gz => Checksum SHA1 OK for emacs20-jumbo-patch-20121210.gz => Checksum RMD160 OK for emacs20-jumbo-patch-20121210.gz => Checksum SHA1 OK for emacs20-xim-20000713.diff => Checksum RMD160 OK for emacs20-xim-20000713.diff ===> Installing dependencies for emacs20-20.7nb16 ========================================================================== The supported build options for emacs20 are: emacs-pop inet6 motif x11 xaw The currently selected options are: emacs-pop inet6 You can select which build options to use by setting PKG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS or the following variable. Its current value is shown: PKG_OPTIONS.emacs (not defined) ========================================================================== => Tool dependency nbpatch-[0-9]*: found nbpatch-20100124 => Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11 ===> Overriding tools for emacs20-20.7nb16 ===> Extracting for emacs20-20.7nb16 /bin/cp /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/files/amd64.h /tmp/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/work/emacs-20.7/src/m /bin/cp /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/files/dragonfly.h /tmp/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/work/emacs-20.7/src/s ===> Patching for emacs20-20.7nb16 => Applying distribution patches for emacs20-20.7nb16 => Applying distribution patch emacs-20.7-mule-4.1b.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |// 2003/01/14: 3rd release, includes fixes (1), (2), (3), (a) and (b). |// 2001/08/30: 2nd release, includes fixes (1), (2), (3) and (a). |// 2000/06/16: 1st release, includes fix (1). | |This is unofficial patch for Emacs 20.7 (with MULE 4.0) to upgrade Emacs |20.7 (with MULE 4.1). In this context, MULE stands for "Multilingal |Environment", not "MULtilingal enhancement to GNU Emacs". | |Note that this patch also contains several fixes below; | |(1) A fix for CCL interpretor (some problem on MapMultiple instraction). | Patch from Miyashita Hisashi who also known as "himi". The original | patch can be found in Mule-UCS 0.80. | |(2) A fix for building problem under Windows. Patch from KOSEKI | Yoshinori (in meadow-users-jp) | |(3) A fix for the problem of invalid post-read-conversion with | decode-coding-string(). Patch from Miyashita Hisashi (in mule-ja) | |(a) Define a new target (bytecomp) to easy building. Patch from Katsumi | Yamaoka (in mule-ja) | |(b) No visible changes; re-generate diff to correct a line number. | Patch from Masao Uebayashi (in private communication) | |This patch is provided by the author "as is" and any express or implied |warranties are disclaimed. | |How to apply: | % tar xzvf emacs-20.7.tar.gz | % tar xzvf leim-20.7.tar.gz | % cd emacs-20.7 | % patch -p1 < somewhere/emacs-20.7-mule-4.1b.patch | % sh configure | % make install | |-- |Satoshi Yatagawa | |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/international/ccl.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/ccl.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/international/ccl.el Sat May 20 20:57:06 2000 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/ccl.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/international/ccl.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 249. Hunk #2 succeeded at 319. Hunk #3 succeeded at 837. Hunk #4 succeeded at 884. Hunk #5 succeeded at 931. Hunk #6 succeeded at 952. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1287. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1309. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/international/mule-cmds.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/mule-cmds.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/international/mule-cmds.el Thu Dec 2 16:42:38 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/mule-cmds.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/international/mule-cmds.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1191. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/international/mule-conf.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/mule-conf.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/international/mule-conf.el Fri Jun 4 08:27:31 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/mule-conf.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/international/mule-conf.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 351. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/international/mule.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/mule.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/international/mule.el Thu Dec 2 20:25:27 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/mule.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/international/mule.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 306. Hunk #3 succeeded at 523. Hunk #4 succeeded at 587. Hunk #5 succeeded at 714. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/international/titdic-cnv.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/titdic-cnv.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/international/titdic-cnv.el Tue Apr 14 10:04:19 1998 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/international/titdic-cnv.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/international/titdic-cnv.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 335. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/loaddefs.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/loaddefs.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/loaddefs.el Thu Jul 15 01:41:03 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/loaddefs.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/loaddefs.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2100. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2113. Hunk #3 succeeded at 2128. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/lisp/loadup.el emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/loadup.el |--- emacs-20.7/lisp/loadup.el Mon May 10 20:42:12 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/lisp/loadup.el Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/loadup.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 285. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/Makefile.in emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/Makefile.in |--- emacs-20.7/src/Makefile.in Mon Apr 26 14:19:42 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/Makefile.in Tue Jan 14 09:25:22 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 804. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/callproc.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/callproc.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/callproc.c Wed May 24 22:58:24 2000 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/callproc.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/callproc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 358. Hunk #2 succeeded at 483. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/ccl.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/ccl.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/ccl.c Sat Feb 26 19:11:31 2000 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/ccl.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/ccl.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 19. Hunk #2 succeeded at 57. Hunk #3 succeeded at 293. Hunk #4 succeeded at 537. Hunk #5 succeeded at 551. Hunk #6 succeeded at 584. Hunk #7 succeeded at 595. Hunk #8 succeeded at 819. Hunk #9 succeeded at 992. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1025. Hunk #11 succeeded at 1187. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1253. Hunk #13 succeeded at 1265. Hunk #14 succeeded at 1278. Hunk #15 succeeded at 1318. Hunk #16 succeeded at 1362. Hunk #17 succeeded at 1386. Hunk #18 succeeded at 1417. Hunk #19 succeeded at 1598. Hunk #20 succeeded at 1622. Hunk #21 succeeded at 1717. Hunk #22 succeeded at 1864. Hunk #23 succeeded at 1908. Hunk #24 succeeded at 1963. Hunk #25 succeeded at 2016. Hunk #26 succeeded at 2116. Hunk #27 succeeded at 2180. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/ccl.h emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/ccl.h |--- emacs-20.7/src/ccl.h Tue May 4 14:40:13 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/ccl.h Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/ccl.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/charset.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/charset.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/charset.c Mon Sep 20 09:43:02 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/charset.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/charset.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 956. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/charset.h emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/charset.h |--- emacs-20.7/src/charset.h Thu Sep 16 20:20:35 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/charset.h Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/charset.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 762. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/coding.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/coding.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/coding.c Fri May 12 00:08:46 2000 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/coding.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:34 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/coding.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 379. Hunk #2 succeeded at 414. Hunk #3 succeeded at 914. Hunk #4 succeeded at 2251. Hunk #5 succeeded at 3054. Hunk #6 succeeded at 3281. Hunk #7 succeeded at 3431. Hunk #8 succeeded at 3490. Hunk #9 succeeded at 3526. Hunk #10 succeeded at 3550. Hunk #11 succeeded at 3578. Hunk #12 succeeded at 3590. Hunk #13 succeeded at 3669. Hunk #14 succeeded at 3764. Hunk #15 succeeded at 3845. Hunk #16 succeeded at 4495. Hunk #17 succeeded at 4627. Hunk #18 succeeded at 4915. Hunk #19 succeeded at 4966. Hunk #20 succeeded at 5176. Hunk #21 succeeded at 5670. Hunk #22 succeeded at 5798. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/coding.h emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/coding.h |--- emacs-20.7/src/coding.h Wed Feb 23 23:08:09 2000 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/coding.h Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/coding.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 423. Hunk #2 succeeded at 442. Hunk #3 succeeded at 460. Hunk #4 succeeded at 478. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/keyboard.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/keyboard.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/keyboard.c Sat May 20 23:20:07 2000 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/keyboard.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/keyboard.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 654. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/keymap.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/keymap.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/keymap.c Sun Oct 10 10:47:12 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/keymap.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/keymap.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1938. Hunk #2 succeeded at 2409. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/lisp.h emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/lisp.h |--- emacs-20.7/src/lisp.h Mon Jan 4 01:31:23 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/lisp.h Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/lisp.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 935. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/lread.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/lread.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/lread.c Thu Oct 14 11:48:29 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/lread.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/lread.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hunk #2 succeeded at 889. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/minibuf.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/minibuf.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/minibuf.c Fri Oct 1 10:56:33 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/minibuf.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/minibuf.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1782. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/xfns.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/xfns.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/xfns.c Thu Jul 1 09:09:39 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/xfns.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/xfns.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5462. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ur emacs-20.7/src/xterm.c emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/xterm.c |--- emacs-20.7/src/xterm.c Mon Aug 2 09:16:43 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7-mule-4.1/src/xterm.c Tue Jan 14 09:22:35 2003 -------------------------- Patching file src/xterm.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6954. done => Applying distribution patch emacs20-xim-20000713.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -Naurw emacs-20.7.orig/src/xfns.c emacs-20.7/src/xfns.c |--- emacs-20.7.orig/src/xfns.c Thu Jul 1 09:09:39 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7/src/xfns.c Sat Jun 17 00:18:36 2000 -------------------------- Patching file src/xfns.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2719. Hunk #2 succeeded at 3129. Hunk #3 succeeded at 3155. Hunk #4 succeeded at 3235. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -Naurw emacs-20.7.orig/src/xterm.c emacs-20.7/src/xterm.c |--- emacs-20.7.orig/src/xterm.c Mon Aug 2 09:16:43 1999 |+++ emacs-20.7/src/xterm.c Wed Jul 12 23:28:40 2000 -------------------------- Patching file src/xterm.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3791. Hunk #2 succeeded at 3859. Hunk #3 succeeded at 4232. Hunk #4 succeeded at 4387. Hunk #5 succeeded at 4527. Hunk #6 succeeded at 5011. Hunk #7 succeeded at 5489. Hunk #8 succeeded at 6368. Hunk #9 succeeded at 7510 (offset -12 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 7619 (offset -12 lines). Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -Naurw emacs-20.7.orig/src/xterm.h emacs-20.7/src/xterm.h |--- emacs-20.7.orig/src/xterm.h Sun Aug 16 07:58:10 1998 |+++ emacs-20.7/src/xterm.h Sat Jun 17 00:18:37 2000 -------------------------- Patching file src/xterm.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 297. Hunk #2 succeeded at 498. Hunk #3 succeeded at 533. Hunk #4 succeeded at 554. Hunk #5 succeeded at 888. done => Applying distribution patch emacs20-jumbo-patch-20121210.gz Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |# HG changeset patch |# User dholland@NetBSD.org |# Date 1355200984 18000 |# Node ID 90211f6af2ec8b7e1f024373501200d878e42b15 |# Parent f2ba32c1d0b69dd5ffe41614ed765f62d6d13ce6 |Fix handling of errno. |(Mostly, don't declare it ourselves.) | |From NetBSD pkgsrc patches: | patch-ah (hunk 1 of 2) | patch-ai (hunk 1 of 3) | patch-an | patch-ap | patch-aq | patch-ar | patch-as | patch-at | patch-au | patch-bq (partial) | patch-bz (hunk 2 of 2) |as of December 10, 2012. | |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec lib-src/emacsclient.c |--- a/lib-src/emacsclient.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/emacsclient.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/emacsclient.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 185. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec lib-src/emacsserver.c |--- a/lib-src/emacsserver.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/emacsserver.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/emacsserver.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/buffer.c |--- a/src/buffer.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/buffer.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/buffer.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/callproc.c |--- a/src/callproc.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/callproc.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/callproc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 25. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/dispnew.c |--- a/src/dispnew.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/dispnew.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/dispnew.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2067. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/emacs.c |--- a/src/emacs.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/emacs.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/emacs.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 601. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/fileio.c |--- a/src/fileio.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/fileio.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/fileio.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 61. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/floatfns.c |--- a/src/floatfns.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/floatfns.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/floatfns.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 109. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/keyboard.c |--- a/src/keyboard.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/keyboard.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/keyboard.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 67. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/lread.c |--- a/src/lread.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/lread.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/lread.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 73. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r f2ba32c1d0b6 -r 90211f6af2ec src/sysdep.c |--- a/src/sysdep.c Mon Dec 10 22:36:26 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/sysdep.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/sysdep.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 104. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |# HG changeset patch |# User dholland@NetBSD.org |# Date 1355201143 18000 |# Node ID 16558b260a241a657995faa85af76050688769a8 |# Parent 90211f6af2ec8b7e1f024373501200d878e42b15 |Use standard C headers where needed. | |From NetBSD pkgsrc patches: | patch-bk | patch-bn | patch-bo | patch-bp (hunk 1 of 2) | patch-bq (partial) | patch-bs (hunk 1 of 2) | patch-bu | patch-bv | patch-bw | patch-by | patch-bz |as of December 10, 2012. | |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lib-src/cvtmail.c |--- a/lib-src/cvtmail.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/cvtmail.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/cvtmail.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lib-src/emacsserver.c |--- a/lib-src/emacsserver.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/emacsserver.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/emacsserver.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lib-src/make-docfile.c |--- a/lib-src/make-docfile.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/make-docfile.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/make-docfile.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lib-src/sorted-doc.c |--- a/lib-src/sorted-doc.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/sorted-doc.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/sorted-doc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lib-src/yow.c |--- a/lib-src/yow.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lib-src/yow.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/yow.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 12. Hunk #2 succeeded at 35. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lwlib/lwlib-utils.c |--- a/lwlib/lwlib-utils.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lwlib/lwlib-utils.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lwlib/lwlib-utils.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 lwlib/lwlib.c |--- a/lwlib/lwlib.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/lwlib/lwlib.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file lwlib/lwlib.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 src/callproc.c |--- a/src/callproc.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/callproc.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/callproc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 src/ralloc.c |--- a/src/ralloc.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/ralloc.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/ralloc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 80. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 src/xmenu.c |--- a/src/xmenu.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/xmenu.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/xmenu.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -r 90211f6af2ec -r 16558b260a24 src/xterm.c |--- a/src/xterm.c Mon Dec 10 23:43:04 2012 -0500 |+++ b/src/xterm.c Mon Dec 10 23:45:43 2012 -0500 -------------------------- Patching file src/xterm.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done => Applying pkgsrc patches for emacs20-20.7nb16 => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-aa => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-aa Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:44 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- man/Makefile.in.orig Sat Dec 5 08:33:16 1998 |+++ man/Makefile.in Fri Aug 6 08:34:06 1999 -------------------------- Patching file man/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 14. Hunk #2 succeeded at 70. Hunk #3 succeeded at 79. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ab => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ab Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.5 2012/03/05 07:29:36 dholland Exp $ | |Caution: the extra cpp checking (the three hunks containing "Should be |one line") is manually hacked and not reflected in configure.in; do |not regenerate configure with autoconf without merging it. This |checking is required because somewhere between gcc 4.1 and 4.5 cpp |started doing regrettable things with backslash-escaped newlines. | |--- configure.orig 2000-06-12 20:05:56.000000000 +0000 |+++ configure -------------------------- Patching file configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. Hunk #2 succeeded at 586. Hunk #3 succeeded at 720. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1532. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1930. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1958. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1979. Hunk #8 succeeded at 3851. Hunk #9 succeeded at 4981. Hunk #10 succeeded at 5344. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ac => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ac Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ac,v 1.3 2008/01/09 18:27:35 kristerw Exp $ | |--- lwlib/xlwmenu.c.orig 2008-01-09 19:14:56.000000000 +0100 |+++ lwlib/xlwmenu.c 2008-01-09 19:15:25.000000000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file lwlib/xlwmenu.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 28. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ad => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ad Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ad,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- etc/ctags.1.orig Fri Jul 17 18:58:29 1992 |+++ etc/ctags.1 Sat Feb 21 20:59:45 1998 -------------------------- Patching file etc/ctags.1 using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ae => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ae Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ae,v 1.3 2012/03/05 03:50:44 dholland Exp $ | |--- Makefile.in.orig 1999-04-09 19:16:24.000000000 +0000 |+++ Makefile.in -------------------------- Patching file Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 295. Hunk #2 succeeded at 313. Hunk #3 succeeded at 343. Hunk #4 succeeded at 424. Hunk #5 succeeded at 457. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-af => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-af Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-af,v 1.2 2003/04/11 04:00:18 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/Makefile.in.orig Thu Mar 27 12:43:25 2003 |+++ src/Makefile.in -------------------------- Patching file src/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 329. Hunk #2 succeeded at 402. Hunk #3 succeeded at 804. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ag => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ag Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ag,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/config.in.orig Sat May 20 23:58:21 2000 |+++ src/config.in Sun Jun 18 09:00:34 2000 -------------------------- Patching file src/config.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 236. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ah => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ah Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ah,v 1.3 2012/12/11 04:54:43 dholland Exp $ | |--- src/fileio.c.orig 2000-05-16 11:02:13.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/fileio.c -------------------------- Patching file src/fileio.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3244 (offset -4 lines). done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ai => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ai Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ai,v 1.3 2012/12/11 04:54:43 dholland Exp $ | |--- src/sysdep.c.orig 2000-05-24 13:59:14.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/sysdep.c -------------------------- Patching file src/sysdep.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2130 (offset -2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 2148 (offset -2 lines). done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-aj => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-aj Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-aj,v 1.2 2006/01/04 17:00:32 joerg Exp $ | |--- src/process.c.orig 2000-05-23 19:10:16.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/process.c -------------------------- Patching file src/process.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 158. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1820. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1847. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1873. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1883. Hunk #7 succeeded at 2042. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ak => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ak Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ak,v 1.2 2010/02/04 06:40:19 dholland Exp $ | |--- lib-src/Makefile.in.orig 1999-11-13 22:41:47.000000000 +0000 |+++ lib-src/Makefile.in -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/Makefile.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 254. Hunk #2 succeeded at 266. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-al => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-al Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-al,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/xfaces.c.orig Wed Nov 18 02:36:41 1998 |+++ src/xfaces.c Sun Sep 1 15:35:41 2002 -------------------------- Patching file src/xfaces.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 20. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-am => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-am Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-am,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/xfns.c.orig Thu Jul 1 02:09:39 1999 |+++ src/xfns.c Sun Sep 1 15:36:55 2002 -------------------------- Patching file src/xfns.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ao => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ao Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ao,v 1.3 2010/02/04 06:40:19 dholland Exp $ | |--- mkinstalldirs.orig 1999-07-14 16:49:24.000000000 +0000 |+++ mkinstalldirs -------------------------- Patching file mkinstalldirs using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ax => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ax Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ax,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/m/mips.h-orig Mon Jun 23 03:49:57 1997 |+++ src/m/mips.h Sat Jan 30 14:28:48 1999 -------------------------- Patching file src/m/mips.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 149. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ay => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ay Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ay,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/m/pmax.h.orig Sun Sep 7 01:23:09 1997 |+++ src/m/pmax.h Fri Feb 18 18:45:03 2000 -------------------------- Patching file src/m/pmax.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 50. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-az => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-az Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-az,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/unexelf.c.orig Mon May 15 01:14:02 2000 |+++ src/unexelf.c Tue Sep 26 14:18:05 2000 -------------------------- Patching file src/unexelf.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 470. Hunk #2 succeeded at 479. Hunk #3 succeeded at 496. Hunk #4 succeeded at 518. Hunk #5 succeeded at 528. Hunk #6 succeeded at 627. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1060. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1074. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ba => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ba Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ba,v 1.1 2008/04/05 21:29:14 kristerw Exp $ | |--- src/widget.c.orig 2008-04-02 22:40:30.000000000 +0200 |+++ src/widget.c 2008-04-04 21:13:56.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- Patching file src/widget.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 464. Hunk #2 succeeded at 474. Hunk #3 succeeded at 484. Hunk #4 succeeded at 538. Hunk #5 succeeded at 854. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bb => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bb Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bb,v 1.1 2008/04/05 21:29:14 kristerw Exp $ | |--- lwlib/lwlib-Xaw.c.orig 1996-01-15 10:17:38.000000000 +0100 |+++ lwlib/lwlib-Xaw.c 2008-04-04 21:35:59.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- Patching file lwlib/lwlib-Xaw.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 84. Hunk #2 succeeded at 611. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bc => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bc,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- /dev/null Fri Mar 26 07:52:59 1999 |+++ lisp/site-init.el Wed Mar 24 09:37:17 1999 -------------------------- (Creating file lisp/site-init.el...) Patching file lisp/site-init.el using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bd => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bd Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bd,v 1.1 2008/04/05 21:29:14 kristerw Exp $ | |--- lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c.orig 1997-12-21 00:02:56.000000000 +0100 |+++ lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c 2008-04-04 21:36:10.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- Patching file lwlib/lwlib-Xm.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 267. Hunk #2 succeeded at 295. Hunk #3 succeeded at 323. Hunk #4 succeeded at 336. Hunk #5 succeeded at 491. Hunk #6 succeeded at 690. Hunk #7 succeeded at 1194. Hunk #8 succeeded at 1225. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1561. Hunk #10 succeeded at 1574. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bf => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bf Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bf,v 1.2 2010/03/30 00:44:48 dholland Exp $ | |--- src/s/netbsd.h.orig 1998-04-11 18:15:19.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/s/netbsd.h -------------------------- Patching file src/s/netbsd.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 42. Hunk #2 succeeded at 68. Hunk #3 succeeded at 77. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bg => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bg Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bg,v 1.2 2012/03/05 07:29:36 dholland Exp $ | |--- configure.in.orig 2000-06-05 15:42:49.000000000 +0000 |+++ configure.in -------------------------- Patching file configure.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. Hunk #2 succeeded at 154. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1600. Hunk #4 succeeded at 1761. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bh => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bh Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bh,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- ./src/frame.h.orig Sat Apr 25 16:17:34 1998 |+++ ./src/frame.h Tue Sep 26 09:38:18 2000 -------------------------- Patching file ./src/frame.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 186. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bi => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bi Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bi,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- ./src/gmalloc.c.orig Mon Feb 21 05:21:51 2000 |+++ ./src/gmalloc.c Tue Sep 26 09:44:47 2000 -------------------------- Patching file ./src/gmalloc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 371. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bj => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bj Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bj,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- ./src/lisp.h.orig Sun Jan 3 08:31:23 1999 |+++ ./src/lisp.h Tue Sep 26 09:48:10 2000 -------------------------- Patching file ./src/lisp.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 123. Hunk #2 succeeded at 153. Hunk #3 succeeded at 171. Hunk #4 succeeded at 270. Hunk #5 succeeded at 358. Hunk #6 succeeded at 367. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bl => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bl Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bl,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- ./src/m/sparc.h.orig Sat Sep 6 11:51:04 1997 |+++ ./src/m/sparc.h Tue Sep 26 12:36:05 2000 -------------------------- Patching file ./src/m/sparc.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 117. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bm => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bm Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bm,v 1.4 2011/12/01 05:12:57 dholland Exp $ | |- use standard headers |- fix type of __malloc_extra_blocks |- add an empty asm() destroying memory that prevents gcc from | optimizing out __malloc_hook and friends (which leads to | SIGSEGV in temacs during build) | |--- src/alloc.c.orig 1999-09-16 07:20:15.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/alloc.c -------------------------- Patching file src/alloc.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 53. Hunk #2 succeeded at 381. Hunk #3 succeeded at 424. Hunk #4 succeeded at 448. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bp => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bp Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bp,v 1.3 2012/12/11 04:54:47 dholland Exp $ | |--- lwlib/lwlib.c.orig 1998-04-06 12:24:33.000000000 +0200 |+++ lwlib/lwlib.c 2008-04-04 21:33:16.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- Patching file lwlib/lwlib.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1298 (offset -2 lines). done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-br => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-br Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-br,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/11 00:31:45 uebayasi Exp $ | |--- src/m/alpha.h.orig Fri Feb 4 12:25:47 2000 |+++ src/m/alpha.h Fri Jul 19 02:56:24 2002 -------------------------- Patching file src/m/alpha.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 147. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bs => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bs Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bs,v 1.3 2012/12/11 04:54:47 dholland Exp $ | |--- src/xmenu.c.orig 1998-12-28 23:15:47.000000000 +0100 |+++ src/xmenu.c 2008-04-02 22:40:18.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- Patching file src/xmenu.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1502 (offset 1 line). done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bt => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bt Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bt,v 1.1 2004/03/25 22:13:34 kristerw Exp $ | |--- src/buffer.h.orig 1998-10-08 08:44:42.000000000 +0200 |+++ src/buffer.h 2004-03-25 22:51:09.000000000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file src/buffer.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 762. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bx => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-bx Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-bx,v 1.1 2004/03/25 22:13:34 kristerw Exp $ | |--- src/tparam.c.orig 2004-03-25 22:23:54.000000000 +0100 |+++ src/tparam.c 2004-03-25 22:26:40.000000000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file src/tparam.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 36. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ca => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ca Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ca,v 1.1 2005/02/09 16:09:43 drochner Exp $ | |--- lib-src/movemail.c.orig 2005-02-09 16:55:15.000000000 +0100 |+++ lib-src/movemail.c -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/movemail.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 765. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cc => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cc Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-cc,v 1.1 2008/07/13 17:28:34 dholland Exp $ | |--- lisp/fast-lock.el.orig 1999-05-14 04:45:54.000000000 -0400 |+++ lisp/fast-lock.el 2008-07-13 12:32:19.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/fast-lock.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 277. Hunk #2 succeeded at 295. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cd => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cd Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-cd,v 1.1 2008/07/13 17:28:34 dholland Exp $ | |--- lisp/loaddefs.el.orig 2008-07-13 12:31:55.000000000 -0400 |+++ lisp/loaddefs.el 2008-07-13 12:32:23.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- Patching file lisp/loaddefs.el using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 5345. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ce => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-ce Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-ce,v 1.1 2008/07/13 17:28:34 dholland Exp $ | |--- lib-src/vcdiff.orig 1997-01-01 00:33:42.000000000 -0500 |+++ lib-src/vcdiff 2008-07-13 13:31:27.000000000 -0400 -------------------------- Patching file lib-src/vcdiff using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 66. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cf => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cf Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-cf,v 1.2 2010/02/21 12:26:47 wiz Exp $ | |When running terminfo but compiled for termcap, we cannot assume |that we actually have anything useable in termcap_term_buffer so just |use the terminfo fixed size defined ealier. | |--- src/term.c 2010-01-14 21:25:59.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/term.c 2010-01-14 21:26:27.000000000 +0000 -------------------------- Patching file src/term.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1647. done => Verifying /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cg => Applying pkgsrc patch /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20/patches/patch-cg Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD: patch-cg,v 1.1 2011/08/01 05:44:26 dholland Exp $ | |Fix illegal C, caught by clang. | |--- src/eval.c~ 2000-05-02 13:33:57.000000000 +0000 |+++ src/eval.c -------------------------- Patching file src/eval.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2090. done ===> Creating toolchain wrappers for emacs20-20.7nb16 ===> Configuring for emacs20-20.7nb16 => Modifying GNU configure scripts to avoid --recheck => Replacing config-guess with pkgsrc versions => Replacing config-sub with pkgsrc versions => Replacing install-sh with pkgsrc version => Checking for portability problems in extracted files creating cache ./config.cache checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure: error: Emacs hasn't been ported to `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu' systems. Check `etc/MACHINES' for recognized configuration names. *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake: stopped in /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20 *** Error code 1 Stop. bmake: stopped in /usr/pkgsrc/editors/emacs20